It is possible to have a better life for Scheduled Tribes in India!
[…] The relative backwardness of scheduled tribes may not disappear through the overall development of a state and that may require special efforts. This is evident from the situation in the state of Kerala. Rural poverty among STs in the state is more than two-and-a-half times of that among its rural population as a whole.
However, the life of Scheduled Tribes in certain parts of India is relatively better. The state of Mizoram and other states in North-East India are one such case. What has enabled the human development of ST population in North-East India (compared to other parts of the country) is an interesting question and we will discuss that in another essay. […]
The relative improvement in Gadchiroli becomes clearer when we note the situation in the adjoining districts of Dantewada and Bastar in the state of Chhattisgarh.
Our short-period field work in the northern blocks of Gadchiroli district (Kurkheda and Korchi) in December 2017 also indicate a relatively better situation there. Tribal families use traditional methods to construct hygienic and comfortable houses. They have access to electricity and drinking water. Households have constructed toilets and there are no visible signs of open defecation. Almost all children go to primary school (located mostly within the village), though there is dropping out after completing 10th grade. There are boys and girls from these hamlets who pursue graduate and post-graduate education. The discussions with people there confirm that there is no serious issue of food poverty, and this could be due to the access to land and also the functioning of the public distribution system. Almost all households have land and these could be of reasonable size (3-5 hectares). Since these hamlets are surrounded by forests, the agricultural land is fertile and can be used for one cropping of paddy cultivation. However, their main source of income is through the collection and sale of Non-Timber Forest Products, facilitated through the community rights under the so called `Forest Rights Act’. […]
Though the institution of Forest Rights Act is a policy action on the part of governments, local mobilisation among Tribal population, and non-governmental organisations have played an important role in its effective implementation. This area has witnessed different forms of social mobilization under leaders coming from tribal communities. […]
Bamboo plantations were developed through the collective action in the community forest area. Bamboo is an important source of income for the tribal population, and a process of harvesting without replantation may work against the sustainability of this income. Hence planning and implementing a project for bamboo harvesting and cultivation are important for the sustained welfare of the population here.
In summary, relatively better human development indicators of the tribal population in the northern bock of Gadchiroli district seem to be shaped by the social and political activism of the tribal leaders and the constructive work and the capacity building of organisations such as Amhi Amchya Arogyasathi. […]
V Santhakumar, a Professor at Azim Premji University [Bangalore], writes on contemporary or real world issues with a lens of economics or social sciences. He teaches economics for development practitioners in the university, and carries out research on education and development issues. His details can be seen in http://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/SitePages/v-santhakumar.aspx
The Lonely Battle of the Indian Farmer
by Vinay Lal, December 6, 2018
[…] Volume Two of the Fifth and Final Report of the Swaminathan Commission commences with two epigrams, one from Gandhi—“To those who are hungry, God is bread”—and the other from Nehru: “Everything else can wait, but not agriculture.” The majority of Indian farmers and members of their households have only two meals a day, and at least 10% have only one meal a day. That those whose labour helps put the food on the tables in the country’s towns and cities should not have enough food for themselves is particularly odious and cruelly ironic. The indisputable fact is that a third of the world’s malnourished children live in India, just as it is clear that the problem is not one of scarcity but rather of accessibility to food. | Read the full blog post >>
(Vinay Lal is a writer, blogger, cultural critic, and Professor of History at UCLA.)
Source: Lal Salaam: A Blog by Vinay Lal
Date visited: 6 December 2018
M S Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) established in 1988 is a not-for-profit trust. MSSRF was envisioned and founded by Professor M S Swaminathan, agriculture scientist with proceeds from the First World Food Prize that he received in 1987. The Foundation aims to accelerate use of modern science for sustainable agricultural and rural development. MSSRF focuses specifically on tribal and rural communities with a pro-poor, pro-women and pro-nature approach. The Foundation applies appropriate science and technology options to address practical problems faced by rural populations in agriculture, food and nutrition.
Source: Harnessing Science for Sustainable Development: About MSSRF
Date visited: 6 December 2018
[Bold typeface added above for emphasis]
Learn more about India’s 29 States and 7 Union Territories: Information provided by the Government of India – From Andhra Pradesh to West Bengal
Search select websites: Govt. of India, NGOs, Indian universities and international organisations – Custom search engine
- Biodiversity Act
- Ecology and environment
- Forest Rights Act (FRA)
- Gandhian social movement
- Health and nutrition
- Indigenous knowledge systems
- M S Swaminathan
- Native science
- Nature and wildlife
- Hyderabad biodiversity pledge
- Revival of traditions
- Rural poverty
- Sacred grove
- Success story
- Tagore and rural culture
- Tribal culture worldwide
- Wildlife tourism