Vivek Menezes, Times of India, 20 January 2019
Why does China soar where India continues to struggle? The most basic reason is state priorities towards education. | Read the full report here >>
As of 1947, the literacy rate in India was barely 11%. But the Chinese emulated Japan’s earlier policy choices (and were themselves soon copied by the south east Asian “tigers”) by investing very heavily in primary education. By contrast, Nehru focused national resources on higher and technical education, leaving hundreds of millions out of the nation’s aspirations. Those fateful decisions underlie the trajectory of both countries into the 21st century.
In this regard, the latest annual state of education report (ASER) surveying schools across India illuminates hope, as well as room for improvement. Produced by the giant non-governmental organization, Pratham Education Foundation, “ASER continues to be the only national source of information about children’s foundational skills across the country” and its vast operations involves 500 partner organizations and 25,000 volunteers reaching out to 589 districts encompassing 562,305 children in 17,473 villages.
ASER 2018 reports school enrolment has reached 97% nationwide, and all trends for primary school attendance are up. While it comes at least two generations late, this means that universal literacy is just around the corner for India. But the jubilation must be tempered, because ASER also reports barely half (50.3%) of Class V students can adequately read at second-standard level.
There’s tremendous variation in ASER 2018, as must be expected from the wildly diverse and fiendishly complicated educational landscape across India. In Manipur, 70% of students go to private schools. In Kerala, Class V student reading ability catapulted 10% in two years (Himachal Pradesh, Chhatisgarh and Odisha are not far behind). But states like Jharkhand, West Bengal, Gujarat and Rajasthan are all trending in the opposite direction, which does not bode well for the future of economic growth in many parts of the country. […]
Source: Small steps out of India’s education quagmire
Date visited: 28 August 2019
Review by PIYUS GANGLULY
Contesting Marginality: Ethnicity, Insurgency and Subnationalism in North-East India
By Sajal Das, Manohar, Rs 795
This book provides an account of the political movementsinvolving the tribal communities of north-east India: the Nagas, Mizos and Meiteis. Sustained insurgency and the demand for secession finally earned them statehood within the Indian union but not independence, which was their professed goal. […]
In Manipur too the advent of colonialism brought about a change in every sphere of life. The land system introduced by the British was qualitatively different from the pre-colonial one. It involved a thorough monetization, commercialization of agriculture and private land ownership. Meanwhile, the introduction of English education among the leading tribes, calculated to serve imperial strength, also helped the growth of a modern middle class. Das points out that “The British emphasis was on structural detribalization while encouraging the retention of tribal way of life at a superficial level.” […]
Source: The Telegraph – Calcutta : Opinion, Friday, January 28, 2005
Address : http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050128/asp/opinion/story_4272862.asp
Date Visited: Mon Jul 11 2011 15:29:54 GMT+0200 (CEST)
[Bold typeface added above for emphasis]
Research the above issues with the help of Shodhganga: A reservoir of theses from universities all over India, made available under Open Access >>
For Indian publications use the present search window